Allah suka padamu...
Kalau Dia punya dompet, pasti fotomu disimpan didalam-nya,
Kalau Dia punya kulkas, fotomu pasti disimpan di pintunya,
Dia mengirim bunga untukmu setiap musim semi dan matahari terbit
setiap
pagi,
Kalau kamu ingin bicara, Dia pasti mau mendengarkan.
Sebenarnya Dia bisa tinggal dimana saja di alam semesta ini,
dan Dia memilih hatimu. Terima saja sobat, Dia tergila-gila
padamu!
Kayak nya mungkin kamu susah sekali percaya bahwa Allah mengenal
namamu.
Dia benar benar mengenal namamu (Yes45:3-4) .
Tertulis ditelapak tangan-Nya,diucapka n dengan mulut-Nya,
Dibisikkan dengan bibir-Nya, Namamu.
Hati kita tidak cukup besar untuk memuat semua berkat yang ingin
Allah
berikan.

Jadi, coba ini :
Kalau matahari terbit membuatmu begitu takjub sampai menahan
nafas,
atau bunga bunga dipadang membuatmu begitu terpesona,
sampai tidak bisa berkata kata tetaplah seperti itu.
Tidak perlu mengatakan apa-apa dan dengarkan sorga berbisik,
"Kau suka itu? Aku melakukannya hanya untukmu"
Kalau kita saja suka memberi hadiah hadiah untuk menunjukkan
kasih
sayang kita,apalagi Dia?

Bisa saja Dia biarkan bumi ini datar dan berwarna abu-abu, tapi
Dia
tidak begitu.
Dipercikan-Nya warna jingga pada matahari terbit,
Dan diberi-Nya warna biru pada langit.
Dan kalau kamu suka melihat sekawanan angsa yang sedang
berkumpul,
kamu juga pasti bisa melihatNya.

Apa Dia harus menjadikan bulu ekor musang empuk dan lembutnya?
Apa Dia harus membuat burung- burung berkicau?
Dan lucunya ayam berjalan tergopoh gopoh.
Atau dasyatnya gelegar guntur ? Mengapa Dia memberi aroma bagi
bunga?
Mengapa Dia memberi rasa pada makanan?
Mungkinkah itu semua karena Dia suka sekali melihat raut
wajahmu?
Jadi berjanjilah, kamu tidak akan lupa,
bahwa kamu bukan suatu kebetulan atau kejadian.. kamu adalah
karunia
bagi dunia.
Karya seni sorgawi, tanda tangan Allah.

(Engkau menenunku didalam kandungan ibuku, Mazmur 139:13)
kamu ditenun/rajutNya, Kamu bukan produksi massal, kamu bukan
hasil
buatan mesin.
Kamu dirancang secara khusus, diberi karunia khusus,dan
ditempatkan
didunia ini dengan penuh kasih..
oleh sang Pencipta Agung.

MenurutNya kamu adalah hal terindah yang melesat turun dari
puncak dalam
sekejap.
Menolehlah kepinggir jalan, lihat,
Allah sedang bersorak sorak memberimu dukungan dalam lomba lari.
Coba lihat ke depan ke garis akhir,
lihat Allah sedang bertepuk tangan memuji langkahmu.

Allah ada bagimu
Kalau Allah punya kalender,pasti tanggal ulang tahunmu sudah di
lingkari.
Kalau Dia menyetir mobil, pasti namamu sudah tertulis di
bemperNya,
Kalau ada pohon di sorga, pasti Dia sudah mengukir namamu
dibatangnya.
Mungkin kamu tidak mau menggangu Allah dengan lukamu.
Tetapi "Dia yang memelihara kamu" ( 1 Petrus 5:7 )

Dia menunggumu, untuk memelukmu. dalam keberhasilan dan
kegagalanmu.
Bapa Sorgawi sangat menyayangimu dan hanya ingin memberikan
kasih-Nya
kepadamu.
Tanpa dibatasi oleh waktu, Allah melihat kita semua.
Gelandangan & anak terlantar, semuanya.
Dia melihat kita sebelum kita dilahirkan. Dan Dia suka dengan
semua yang
dilihatNya.
Dengan luapan emosi, penuh kebanggaan,sang Pencipta bintang itu
menoleh
ke arah kita,
satu persatu dan mengatakan "Engkau anakKu, Aku sangat
mengasihimu"

Aku tahu, suatu hari nanti, engkau akan berpaling dariKu
dan menjauh. Tetapi Aku ingin engkau tahu,Aku telah menyediakan
jalan
pulang bagimu.
Kamu telah memikat hati Allah. Dia tidak sanggup hidup tanpamu.
Impian Allah, membawamu dengan denganNya.
Dan jalan menuju salib, memberitahu kita, sejauh apa jalan yang
Allah
tempuh
untuk memanggil kita kembali kepadaNya.
"Apa yang bisa membuatKu berhenti mengasihimu? "tanya Allah.
"Ingin tahu berapa lama kasihKu akan bertahan?
Lihat saja, Aku bicara dalam bahasamu,tidur diduniamu, dan
merasakan
sakitmu.
temukan jawabannya diatas kayu salib itu,di atas bukit berbatu
itu.
Itulah bukti besarnya kasihKu kepadamu"

Masih banyak yang Allah lakukan selain mengampuni kesalahan
kita,
Dia menghapusnya! kita hanya harus membawa kesalahan kita
kepadaNya.
Kamu bisa bicara dengan Allah karena Allah pasti mendengarkan.
Biar saja air mata menetes dipipimu Ia akan menyekanya.

Dia telah mengutus malaikat malaikat Nya untuk
menjagaimu(Maz. 91:11),
Roh KudusNya untuk tinggal didalammu. Gereja Nya untuk mendukung
mu
dan pedangNya untuk mempimpin mu.

Sebesar kerinduan mu untuk bertemu dengannya,
lebih besar lagi kerinduanNya untuk bertemu denganmu.
Kalau kamu menyetuh hati Allah, pakai lah nama sebutan yang
paling Ia
sukai
panggil dia "Bapa"

Menurut Allah, kamu indah!
(by Max Lucado)
karena sungguh Allah mengasihimu. ..(Yes43: 4)

<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,0,0" width="600" height="425" id="flying" align="middle">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" />
<param name="movie" value="http://www.sonybmg.co.id/thefly/flying.swf" />
<param name="quality" value="high" />
<param name="bgcolor" value="#efefef" />
<embed src="http://www.sonybmg.co.id/thefly/flying.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#efefef" width="600" height="425" name="fly_prompt6" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" />
</object>

Ten Things to Do When You Really, Really Hate Your Job
There are as many reasons for hating a job as there are jobs. Some of the most prevalent include a lack of autonomy and flexibility, a corporate culture that doesn't fit with your values, feeling disrespected or unappreciated, and discrepancies in pay. But the top reason is a difficult boss. Here are then things to do when you really, really hate your job:

1. Begin focusing on what you want instead of how much you want to escape. When you find yourself sharing the latest horror story, stop in mid-sentence and say, "What I want to have is..."

2. Create an image that describes you in your job. Are you on a riverbank with no way to get to the other side? Lost in a jungle? Poking through a thorny hedge? When you get comfortable with the image, begin visualizing a change in the obstacle. Imagine building a bridge across the river or finding a path in the forest. Don't force the image or the change. When you're ready it will come.

3. Think of developing skills, not serving time. Take every course that's offered and focus on skills that can lay a foundation for your own business or next job. Can you learn HTML or PowerPoint? Can you use some evenings, weekend! s and lunch hours to solicit some free lance gigs?

4. Focus on satisfactory, not superior performance. Use the time difference to build your new life. People often say, "I can't do anything -- I work ten hours a day!"

If you are firing yourself or expecting to be fired, your job is finding a new job. Be ethical: you owe your company the minimum you need to earn your salary." But don't be surprised if you start to accomplish more than ever and find yourself getting promoted.

5. What conflict are you escaping? Dishonesty? Corporate greed? Hypocrisy? Allow yourself to wonder if these qualities are mirrored in your own life -- or even in your mind. If everyone around you seems dishonest, are you being dishonest with yourself? With others? After you resolve your own conflict, you may find the workplace has c! hanged or you have been catapulted into a new, more satisfying life.

6. Put on your shield and armor when you enter your workplace. Everyone should learn how to create a psychic shield. Imagine that you are surrounded by an outer shell that is made of a solid material -- so strong that nothing can get through to hurt you. Some people prefer to imagine a protective golden light, but I think the solid shield is stronger. Take two or three minutes to put on your shield, every day, before you enter the workplace.

7. Give yourself a gift every day -- a splurge of time or sensual taste buds. Read a book, talk to a friend, eat your favorite food. Don't deaden your senses with alcohol (although if you're a wine connoisseur, your special wine can be a gift) or spend big bucks at the mall. Think simple.

8. Fi! nd at least one thing in your life to appreciate: the softness of your cat's fur, the winter sky, the spontaneous hug from a friend. Appreciate as much as possible about your job: the money, the view from the window, the new computer, friendly conversations with the guy down the hall. Savor the experience. Appreciation is the engine that attracts good things into your life.

9. Tune in to your intuition before deciding what to do next. Meditate and listen to the world around you. The saying "frying pan into the fire" is real. If your goals and desires do not come from a secure place within yourself, you will find yourself paying undue attention to wet blankets ("If you quit you'll never get another job") and false friends ("Just quit! Move to Tahiti! You won't starve!"). Sometimes the same "advisor" proposes both ideas in the same week. A good coach or counselor will give you confidence in your own intuition, not impose their v! iews of what you should do now.

10. Write this down somewhere: After you've left -- and you will -- all that time will seem to have gone in the blink of an eye. You will have trouble remembering what bothered you so much. The rest of your life will still be ahead of you.

Ada 5 buah rumah yang masing2 memiliki warna berbeda. Setiap rumah dihuni satu
orang pria dgn kebangsaan yang berbeda-beda. Setiap penghuni menyukai satu jenis
minuman tertentu, merokok satu merek tertentu dan memelihara satu jenis hewan
tertentu. Tidak ada satupun dari kelima orang tersebut yang minum minuman yang
sama, merokok merek rokok yang sama dan memelihara hewan yang sama seperti
penghuni yang lain.
PERTANYAANNYA : SIAPAKAH YANG MEMELIHARA IKAN ?

Petunjuk :
- Orang Inggris tinggal dirumah yang berwarna merah.
- Orang Swedia memelihara Anjing.
- Orang Denmark senang minum teh.
- Rumah berwarna hijau terletak tepat disebelah kiri rumah berwarna putih.
- Penghuni rumah berwarna hijau senang minum kopi.
- Orang yang merokok Pall Mall memelihara burung.
- Penghuni rumah yang ditengah2 senag minum susu.
- Penghuni rumah berwarna kuning merokok Dunhill.
- Orang Norwegia tinggal dirumah paling pertama.
- Orang yg merokok Marlboro tinggal disebelah orang yg memelihara kucing.
- Orang yang memelihara kuda tinggal disebelah orang yang merokok Dunhill.
- Orang yang merokok Winfield senang minum bir.
- Disebelah rumah berwarna bi! ru tinggal orang norwegia.
- Orang Jerman merokok Rothmans.
- Orang yang merokok Marlboro bertetangga dengan orang yang minum air.

Albert Einstein menyusun teka-teki ini pada abad yang lalu. Dia menyatakan 98 % penduduk didunia tidak mampu memecahkan teka-teki ini. Apakah anda termasuk yang 2% ?
Selamat mencoba !!! 

 

Dibawah ini adalah emal dari salah satu milis yg saya terima. Untuk komentar saya tentang hal ini, sabar ya! Akan menyusul komentar saya tentang Ekskul vs MFI.
========================================================
Kepada rekan-rekan, bersama ini saya mengabarkan tentang Pernyataan Sikap
Masyarakat Film Indonesia yang dinyatakan pada 3 Januari 2007 di Teater
Kecil, TIM, Jakarta, pukul 15.00 WIB.

Isi pernyataan, dokumen dan hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan pernyataan
tersebut adalah sebagai berikut:

(Pengantar Pernyataan Sikap Masyarakat Film Indonesia) (HYPERLINK \l
"pernyataan_ pernyataan" Pernyataan Sikap Bersama Masyarakat Film Indonesia)
(HYPERLINK \l "citra_citra" Daftar Piala Citra yang Dikembalikan)

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
-----

PENGANTAR PERNYATAAN SIKAP MFI

Surat Pernyataan Sikap Bersama berangkat dari kegelisahan masyarakat film
atas perkembangan perfilman Indonesia. Pernyataan ini adalah sikap sebuah
gerakan yang dilakukan oleh individu-individu yang terlibat dalam dunia
perfilman Indonesia. Ini bukanlah gerakan sporadis yang hanya memiliki
tujuan sesaat atas kenyataan yang terjadi pada Festival Film Indonesia
melainkan sebuah gerakan terstruktur untuk kemajuan perfilman Indonesia.

Masyarakat film yang mendukung pernyataan ini telah melakukan pertemuan pada
tanggal 24 Desember dan 29 Desember 2006 di Jakarta. Dari dua pertemuan
tersebut, masyarakat film telah menyusun kelompok kerja yang diberi mandat
untuk menyusun pernyataan sikap bersama dan menyampaikannya pada hari ini.

Kami percaya bahwa film adalah praktik budaya yang juga merupakan satu
kegiatan intelektual dan ekonomi yang dapat memberikan sumbangan pada
kecerdasan dan kesejahteraan bangsa. Untuk itu, arah dan strategi
pengembangan perfilman yang sehat akan berpengaruh pada sehatnya
perkembangan perfilman Indonesia. Segala bentuk penyelewengan dan usaha
penghambatan atas kemajuan perfilman Indonesia secara langsung telah dan
akan berdampak pada kewibawaan dan nama baik pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Usaha untuk memberikan masukan atas arah dan strategi pengembangan perfilman
Indonesia yang lebih sehat sudah pernah berulang kali kami lakukan
sebelumnya. Usaha tersebut merupakan wujud perhatian kami atas kemajuan
perfilman Indonesia. Namun, usaha tersebut tidak pernah mendapat tanggapan
serius dari pemerintah dan tidak ada perubahan yang signifikan.

Masyarakat film yang termaktub sebagai pendukung pernyataan ini adalah
individu-individu pekerja film yang mengatasnamakan dirinya sendiri tanpa
mewakili kelompok, perusahaan atau komunitas tertentu. Hal tersebut
dinyatakan dengan kesadaran penuh bahwa pernyataan yang disampaikan pada
hari ini adalah kehendak individu yang bekerja di dunia film untuk kemajuan
perfilman Indonesia. Kami, masyarakat film, adalah para produser film,
sutradara, penulis skenario, penulis kritik film, musisi, kru produksi,
penata kamera, animator, penata artistik, penata cahaya, editor, publisis,
pemerhati dan periset film Indonesia, aktivis komunitas film, penyelenggara
festival film non-pemerintah, kurator dan programmer film, dan
individu-individu yang memiliki hubungan langsung dan tidak langsung dalam produksi film.

Hingga saat ini, masyarakat film yang telah membubuhkan tanda tangannya
sebagai tanda dukungan atas pernyataan ini berjumlah 202 orang. Tanda
dukungan dari individu-individu atas pernyataan ini akan terus berlangsung.
Daftar dukungan akan disebar ke berbagai kota untuk memperoleh dukungan luas
dari individu-individu bagian dari masyarakat film dari berbagai kota di
Indonesia.

Surat Pernyataan Sikap Bersama ini kami ditujukan kepada Menteri Budaya dan
Pariwisata Republik Indonesia - Ir. Jero Wacik, SE - dengan tembusan kepada:

1. Presiden Republik Indonesia – Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono

2. Dirjen Nilai Budaya, Seni dan Film, DEPBUDPAR - Prof. Dr. Sri
Hastanto, S.Kar

3. Sekretaris Direktorat Jenderal Nilai Budaya, Seni dan Film,
DEPBUDPAR - Drs. Sutrisno, MM

4. Direktur Perfilman, DEPBUDPAR - Drs. Bakri, MM

5. Ketua Badan Pertimbangan Perfilman Nasional - Bp. Djony Syafruddin

6. Serta para anggota Komisi X - DPR RI yang terhormat.

Pengembalian piala-piala Citra yang terkumpul saat ini akan dilakukan
langsung oleh para pemegangnya secara langsung kepada Menteri Kebudayaan dan
Pariwisata di Kantor BUDPAR pada tanggal 9 Januari 2007. Keterangan lebih
lanjut mengenai teknis pelaksanaan pengembalian piala-piala tersebut akan
diberitahukan kepada rekan-rekan pers secepatnya setelah hari ini.

Demikianlah pernyataan sikap bersama ini kami sampaikan. Bersama ini kami
mengajak semua pihak yang memiliki perhatian atas kemajuan perfilman
Indonesia untuk memberi dukungan atas gerakan ini. Segala bentuk dukungan
kepada gerakan ini harus dinyatakan atas nama individu dan bukan atas nama
lembaga, perusahaan atau nama komunitas apa pun.

PERNYATAAN SIKAP BERSAMA MASYARAKAT FILM INDONESIA

Kami masyarakat film Indonesia percaya bahwa Festival Film Indonesia
seharusnya menjadi tolok ukur perkembangan film Indonesia, menjadi stimulasi penciptaan melalui penghargaan yang sesuai dengan pencapaian film
Indonesia, serta sarana apresiasi bagi masyarakat Indonesia.

Kami juga percaya bahwa Festival Film Indonesia seharusnya mencerminkan
kebijakan perfilman Indonesia, yang tanggap terhadap dinamika perkembangan
dunia film.

Atas dasar pemikiran tersebut, kami menyatakan protes:

1. Terhadap penyelenggaraan dan hasil penjurian Festival Film Indonesia
2006. Protes ini didasarkan pada fakta bahwa film “Ekskul” produksi PT.
Indika Entertainment yang memenangi piala Citra sebagai film terbaik,
menurut kami telah melakukan pelanggaran hak cipta dalam penggunaan
ilustrasi musik film.

Situasi ini membuktikan buruknya kualitas penyelenggaraan FFI dan rendahnya
kompetensi pihak penyelenggara FFI, yang antara tahun 2004-2006
diselenggarakan secara tidak transparan, baik dalam sisi pelaksanaan dan
sisi finansial.

Hal di atas juga mencerminkan buruknya kinerja Departemen Kebudayaan dan
Pariwisata dalam melakukan penataan perfilman Indonesia.

2. Terhadap sistem kelembagaan perfilman Indonesia yang masih dijalankan
oleh lembaga dan organisasi bentukan Departemen Penerangan di masa Orde
Baru. Lembaga yang kami maksud adalah Lembaga Sensor Film (LSF), Badan
Pertimbangan Perfilman Nasional (BP2N), dan organisasi-organisa si yang
bernaung didalamnya. Lembaga-lembaga dan organisasi-organisa si tersebut
tidak mencerminkan semangat pembaharuan dan tidak berpihak pada kemajuan
perfilman Indonesia.

Stagnasi sistem ini telah merugikan dan menghambat proses perkembangan film
Indonesia yang telah menunjukkan potensi kemajuannya sejak awal masa
reformasi.

Untuk itu kami masyarakat film Indonesia, menuntut pihak Departemen
Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata untuk melakukan langkah-langkah sebagai berikut:

1. Demi nama baik perfilman Indonesia, segera mencabut anugerah piala
Citra film terbaik dan yang berkaitan dengan film tersebut dalam FFI 2006
dan meminta penyelenggara FFI 2006 untuk melakukan pertanggungjawaban hasil
penilaian terhadap film tersebut secara terbuka kepada publik.
2. Menghentikan sementara penyelenggaraan Festival Film Indonesia.
3. Segera membubarkan lembaga-lembaga perfilman yang ada, dan membentuk
sistem kelembagaan perfilman yang baru, secara demokratis dan transparan,
yang sesuai dengan perkembangan film saat ini dengan melibatkan para pelaku
aktif perfilman Indonesia.
4. Mendesak DPR RI untuk segera mencabut Undang Undang No.8 tahun 1992
tentang Perfilman dan menggantinya dengan Undang-undang baru yang mendukung kemajuan.
5. Segera membuat rancangan kebijakan yang bersifat strategis bagi
perkembangan budaya dan ekonomi perfilman Indonesia, dengan melibatkan para
pelaku aktif perfilman Indonesia.
6. Melakukan perubahan mendasar pada peraturan dan penyelenggaraan
sensor film dengan mengganti Lembaga Sensor Film menjadi sebuah Lembaga
Klasifikasi Film.

Sebagai tanda keseriusan kami, dengan ini kami mengembalikan Piala Citra
yang telah kami terima dalam penyelenggaraan FFI 2004 – 2006.

Apabila tuntutan di atas tidak ditanggapi, kami akan melakukan boikot
terhadap penyelenggaraan FFI di masa yang akan datang, dan melakukan
perlawanan secara terstruktur terhadap segala kegiatan yang diselenggarakan
atau diadakan oleh badan pemerintah yang mengatasnamakan PERFILMAN
INDONESIA.


Sikap ini kami ambil sebagai wujud tanggung-jawab kami kepada masyarakat
yang selama ini mendukung keberadaan kami dan menjadi salah satu alasan
utama mengapa kami terus bekerja dan berkarya.

Jakarta, 3 Januari 2007

Masyarakat Film Indonesia,

Daftar Piala Citra yang dikembalikan (per 3 Januari 2007):

Nama

Judul Film/Kategori/ Tahun

01

Dewi Alibasah

Arisan (Editing Terbaik, 2004)

02

Prima Rusdi dan Riri Riza

Eliana, Eliana (Skenario Film Terbaik 2004)

03

Riri Riza dan Mira Lesmana

Gie (Film Terbaik 2005); Eliana, Eliana (Penghargaan Khusus Dewan Juri 2005)

04

Dian Sastrowardoyo

Ada Apa dengan Cinta (Aktris Terbaik, 2004)

05

Tora Sudiro

Arisan (Aktor Terbaik, 2004)

06

Rachael Maryam

Arisan (Aktris Pendukung Terbaik, 2004)

07

Surya Saputra

Arisan (Aktor Pendukung Terbaik, 2004)

08

Rudy Soedjarwo

Ada Apa dengan Cinta (Sutradara Terbaik, 2004)

09

Nicholas Saputra

Gie (Aktor Terbaik, 2005)

10

Marcella Zalianty

Brownies (Aktris Terbaik, 2005)

11

Wencislaus

Berbagi Suami (Penata Artistik, 2006)

12

Nia Dinata

Arisan (Film Terbaik, 2004)

13

John De Rantau, Jeremias Nyangoen, Masree Rulia, dan Monty Tiwa

Denias (Skenario Cerita Asli, 2006),

14

Eric Sasono

Kritik Film Terbaik (2005 & 2006)

15

Melly Goeslaw dan Anto Hoed

Ada Apa dengan Cinta (Penata Musik Terbaik, 2004), Tentang Dia (Penata Musik
Terbaik 2005)

16

Satrio Budiono dan Adityawan Susanto

Eliana, Eliana (Penata Suara Terbaik, 2004)

17

Hanung Bramantyo

Brownies (Sutradara Terbaik, 2005)

18

Rahmat Syaiful

Mengejar Matahari (Penata Kamera Terbaik, 2004)

19

Yudi Datau

Gie (Penata Kamera Terbaik, 2005); Denias (Penata Kamera Terbaik, 2006)

20

Edwin

Kara Anak Sebatang Pohon (Film Pendek Terbaik, 2005)

21

Hafiz

Alam: Syuhada (Penghargaan Khusus Dewan Juri Film Pendek 2005)

22

Adinia Wirasti

Tentang Dia (Aktris Pendukung Terbaik, 2005)

23

Tino Saroengallo

Indonesian Student Movement (Dokumenter Terbaik, 2004)

24

Yoga Krispratama

Janji Joni (Editing Terbaik, 2005)

Piala khusus lain (dianugerahkan dalam FFI):

25. Chand Parwez:

- Piala Nyao Han Siang 2006 (Penghargaan Khusus untuk Produser yg
paling banyak memanfaatkan Jasa Teknik Film Dalam Negeri)

- Piala Antemas 2006 (Film dengan jumlah penonton terbanyak

The Doll and The Rose

    I was walking around in a store. I saw a  cashier hand this little boy his money back  saying  "I'm sorry, but you don't have enough money to  buy this doll."
    Then the little boy turned to the old woman next to him: ''Granny, are you sure I don't have enough money?''
    The old lady replied: ''You know that you don't have enough money to buy this doll, my dear.''
    Then she asked him to stay there for 5  minutes while she went to look around. She left  quickly.
    The little boy was still holding the doll in his hand  Finally, I walked toward him and I asked him  who he wished to give this doll to.
    "It's the doll that my sister loved most and wanted so much for  this Christmas. She was so  sure that Santa Claus would bring it to her."     

    I replied to him that maybe Santa Claus will  bring it to her after all, and not to worry.
    But he replied to me sadly. "No, Santa Claus can't bring it to her where she is now. I have  to  give the doll to my mommy so that she can give  it to  my sister when she goes there."
    His eyes were so sad while saying this. "My  sister has gone to be with God. Daddy says that  Mommy is going to see God very soon too, so I  thought that she could take the doll with her to give it to my sister.''
    My heart nearly stopped. The little boy looked up at me and said:     "I  told daddy to tell mommy not to go yet. I need  her  to wait until I come back from the mall."
    Then he showed me a very nice photo of him  where he was laughing. He then told me "I want  mommy  to take my picture with her so she won't forget  me."
    "I love my mommy and I wish she doesn't have to leave me, but daddy says that she has to go to be  with my little sister."
    Then he looked again at the doll with sad  eyes, very quietly.
    I quickly reached for my wallet and said to  the boy. "What if we checked again, just in case  you  do have enough money?''
    "OK" he said "I hope that I have enough." I  added some of my money to his without him seeing  and  we started to count it. There was enough for the  doll and even some spare money.
    The little boy said: "Thank you God for  giving me enough money!"
    Then he looked at me and added "I asked  yesterday before I slept for God to make sure I  have  enough money to buy this doll so that mommy can  give it to my sister. He heard me!'' 

    "I also wanted to have enough money to buy a white rose for my mommy, but I didn't dare to ask  God for too much. But He gave me enough to buy the doll and a white rose.''
    "My mommy loves white roses."
    A few minutes later, the older lady came again  and I left with my basket.
    I finished my shopping in a totally  different state from when I started. I couldn't  get the little boy  out of my mind.  Then I remembered a local newspaper article 2 days ago, which mentioned of a drunk man in a  truck, who hit a car, where there was one young lady and a  little  girl.  The little girl died right away, and the  mother was left in a critical state. The family  had to decide whether to pull the plug on the  life-assisting machine, because the young lady  would not be able to recover from the coma.
    Was this the family of the little boy?
    Two days after this encounter with the  little boy, I read in the newspaper that the  young lady had passed away.  I couldn't stop myself as I bought a bunch  of white roses and I went to the funeral home  where  the body of the young woman was exposed for  people  to see and make last wishes before burial.
    She was there, in her coffin, holding a  beautiful white rose in her hand with the photo  of the little boy and the doll placed over her  chest.  I left the place, teary-eyed, feeling that  my life had been changed forever. The love that  this  little boy had for his mother and his sister is  still, to this day, hard to imagine.
    And in a  fraction of a second, a drunk driver had taken  all  this away from him.

MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS
*POPE BENEDICT XVI*
FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE
*WORLD DAY OF PEACE*

*1 JANUARY 2007*

*THE HUMAN PERSON, THE HEART OF PEACE*

1. At the beginning of the new year, I wish to extend prayerful good wishes
for peace to Governments, leaders of nations and all men and women of good
will. In a special way, I invoke peace upon all those experiencing pain and
suffering, those living under the threat of violence and armed aggression,
and those who await their human and social emancipation, having had their
dignity trampled upon. I invoke peace upon children, who by their innocence
enrich humanity with goodness and hope, and by their sufferings compel us
all to work for justice and peace. Out of concern for children, especially
those whose future is compromised by exploitation and the malice of
unscrupulous adults, I wish on this World Day of Peace to encourage everyone
to reflect on the theme:* The Human Person, the Heart of Peace*. I am
convinced that respect for the person promotes peace and that, in building
peace, the foundations are laid for an authentic integral humanism. In this
way a serene future is prepared for coming generations.

*The human person and peace: gift and task*

2. Sacred Scripture affirms that "God created man in his own image, in the
image of God he created them; male and female he created them" (*Gen* 1:27).
* As one created in the image of God, each individual human being has the
dignity of a person*; he or she is not just something, but someone, capable
of self-knowledge, self-possession, free self-giving and entering into
communion with others. At the same time, each person is called, by grace, to
a covenant with the Creator, called to offer him a response of faith and
love that no other creature can give in his
place(1<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn1>).
From this supernatural perspective, one can understand the task entrusted to
human beings to mature in the ability to love and to contribute to the
progress of the world, renewing it in justice and in peace. In a striking
synthesis, Saint Augustine teaches that "God created us without our aid; but
he did not choose to save us without our
aid(2<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn2>)."
Consequently all human beings have the duty to cultivate *an awareness of
this twofold aspect of gift and task*.

3. Likewise,* peace is both gift and task*. If it is true that peace between
individuals and peoples—the ability to live together and to build
relationships of justice and solidarity—calls for unfailing commitment on
our part, it is also true, and indeed more so, that* peace is a gift from
God*. Peace is an aspect of God's activity, made manifest both in the
creation of an orderly and harmonious universe and also in the redemption of
humanity that needs to be rescued from the disorder of sin. Creation and
Redemption thus provide a key that helps us begin to understand the meaning
of our life on earth. My venerable predecessor Pope John Paul II, addressing
the General Assembly of the United Nations on 5 October
1995<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ john_paul_ ii/speeches/ 1995/october/ documents/ hf_jp-ii_ spe_05101995_ address-to- uno_en.html>,
stated that "we do not live in an irrational or meaningless world... there
is a moral logic which is built into human life and which makes possible
dialogue between individuals and
peoples(3<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn3>)
." The transcendent "grammar", that is to say the body of rules for
individual action and the reciprocal relationships of persons in accordance
with justice and solidarity, is inscribed on human consciences, in which the
wise plan of God is reflected. As I recently had occasion to reaffirm: "we
believe that at the beginning of everything is the Eternal Word, Reason and
not Unreason(4<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn4>)."
Peace is thus also a task demanding of everyone a personal response
consistent with God's plan. The criterion inspiring this response can only
be* respect for the "grammar" written on human hearts by the divine Creator*.

From this standpoint, the norms of the natural law should not be viewed as
externally imposed decrees, as restraints upon human freedom. Rather, they
should be welcomed as a call to carry out faithfully the universal divine
plan inscribed in the nature of human beings. Guided by these norms, all
peoples —within their respective cultures—can draw near to the greatest
mystery, which is the mystery of God. Today too, recognition and respect for
natural law represents the foundation for a dialogue between the followers
of the different religions and between believers and non-believers. As a
great *point of convergence* , this is also a fundamental presupposition for
authentic peace.

*The right to life and to religious freedom*

4. The duty to respect the dignity of each human being, in whose nature the
image of the Creator is reflected, means in consequence that *the person can
not be disposed of at will*. Those with greater political, technical, or
economic power may not use that power to violate the rights of others who
are less fortunate. Peace is based on respect for the rights of all.
Conscious of this, the Church champions the fundamental rights of each
person. In particular she promotes and defends respect for the *life *and
the* religious freedom* of everyone. Respect for the right to life at every
stage firmly establishes a principle of decisive importance:* life is a gift
which is not completely at the disposal of the subject*. Similarly, the
affirmation of the right to religious freedom places the human being *in a
relationship with a transcendent principle which withdraws him from human
caprice*. The right to life and to the free expression of personal faith in
God is not subject to the power of man. Peace requires the establishment of
*a clear boundary between what is at man's disposal and what is not*: in
this way unacceptable intrusions into the patrimony of specifically human
values will be avoided.

5. As far as *the right to life* is concerned, we must denounce its
widespread violation in our society: alongside the victims of armed
conflicts, terrorism and the different forms of violence, there are the
silent deaths caused by hunger, abortion, experimentation on human embryos
and euthanasia. How can we fail to see in all this an attack on peace?
Abortion and embryonic experimentation constitute a direct denial of that
attitude of acceptance of others which is indispensable for establishing
lasting relationships of peace. As far as* the free expression of personal
faith* is concerned, another disturbing symptom of lack of peace in the
world is represented by the difficulties that both Christians and the
followers of other religions frequently encounter in publicly and freely
professing their religious convictions. Speaking of Christians in
particular, I must point out with pain that not only are they at times
prevented from doing so; in some States they are actually persecuted, and
even recently tragic cases of ferocious violence have been recorded. There
are regimes that impose a single religion upon everyone, while secular
regimes often lead not so much to violent persecution as to systematic
cultural denigration of religious beliefs. In both instances, a fundamental
human right is not being respected, with serious repercussions for peaceful
coexistence. This can only promote* a mentality and culture that is not
conducive to peace*.

*The natural equality of all persons*

6. At the origin of many tensions that threaten peace are surely *the many
unjust inequalities* still tragically present in our world. Particularly
insidious among these are, on the one hand,* inequality in access to
essential goods *like food, water, shelter, health; on the other hand, there
are* persistent inequalities between men and women in the exercise of basic
human rights*.

A fundamental element of building peace is the recognition of the* essential
equality of human persons* springing from their common transcendental
dignity. Equality on this level is a good belonging to all, inscribed in
that natural "grammar" which is deducible from the divine plan of creation;
it is a good that cannot be ignored or scorned without causing serious
repercussions which put peace at risk. The extremely grave deprivation
afflicting many peoples, especially in Africa, lies at the root of violent
reactions and thus inflicts a terrible wound on peace.

7. Similarly, inadequate consideration for the* condition of women *helps to
create instability in the fabric of society. I think of the exploitation of
women who are treated as objects, and of the many ways that a lack of
respect is shown for their dignity; I also think —in a different context—of
the mindset persisting in some cultures, where women are still firmly
subordinated to the arbitrary decisions of men, with grave consequences for
their personal dignity and for the exercise of their fundamental freedoms.
There can be no illusion of a secure peace until these forms of
discrimination are also overcome, since they injure the personal dignity
impressed by the Creator upon every human
being(5<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn5>
).

*The "ecology of peace"*

8. In his Encyclical Letter* Centesimus
Annus<http://www.vatican. va/edocs/ ENG0214/_ INDEX.HTM>
*, Pope John Paul II wrote: "Not only has God given the earth to man, who
must use it with respect for the original good purpose for which it was
given to him, but man too is God's gift to man. He must therefore respect
the natural and moral structure with which he has been
endowed(6<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn6>)."
By responding to this charge, entrusted to them by the Creator, men and
women can join in bringing about a world of peace. Alongside the ecology of
nature, there exists what can be called a "human" ecology, which in turn
demands a "social" ecology. All this means that humanity, if it truly
desires peace, must be increasingly conscious of the links between natural
ecology, or respect for nature, and human ecology. Experience shows
that*disregard for the environment always harms human coexistence
*, and vice versa. It becomes more and more evident that there is an
inseparable link between peace with creation and peace among men. Both of
these presuppose peace with God. The poem-prayer of Saint Francis, known as
"the Canticle of Brother Sun", is a wonderful and ever timely example of
this multifaceted ecology of peace.

9. The close connection between these two ecologies can be understood from
the increasingly serious problem of* energy supplies*. In recent years, new
nations have entered enthusiastically into industrial production, thereby
increasing their energy needs. This has led to an unprecedented race for
available resources. Meanwhile, some parts of the planet remain backward and
development is effectively blocked, partly because of the rise in energy
prices. What will happen to those peoples? What kind of development or
non-development will be imposed on them by the scarcity of energy supplies?
What injustices and conflicts will be provoked by the race for energy
sources? And what will be the reaction of those who are excluded from this
race? These are questions that show how respect for nature is closely linked
to the need to establish, between individuals and between nations,
relationships that are attentive to the dignity of the person and capable of
satisfying his or her authentic needs. The destruction of the environment,
its improper or selfish use, and the violent hoarding of the earth's
resources cause grievances, conflicts and wars, precisely because they are
the consequences of an inhumane concept of development. Indeed, if
development were limited to the technical-economic aspect, obscuring the
moral-religious dimension, it would not be an integral human development,
but a one-sided distortion which would end up by unleashing man's
destructive capacities.

*Reductive visions of man*

10. Thus there is an urgent need, even within the framework of current
international difficulties and tensions, for a commitment to* a human
ecology that can favour the growth of the "tree of peace"*. For this to
happen, we must be guided by a vision of the person untainted by ideological
and cultural prejudices or by political and economic interests which can
instil hatred and violence. It is understandable that visions of man will
vary from culture to culture. Yet what cannot be admitted is the cultivation
of *anthropological conceptions* that contain the seeds of hostility and
violence. Equally unacceptable are* conceptions of God* that would encourage
intolerance and recourse to violence against others. This is a point which
must be clearly reaffirmed: war* in God's name *is never acceptable! When a
certain notion of God is at the origin of criminal acts, it is a sign that
that notion has already become an ideology.

11. Today, however, peace is not only threatened by the conflict between
reductive visions of man, in other words, between ideologies. It is also
threatened by* indifference as to what constitutes man's true nature*. Many
of our contemporaries actually deny the existence of a specific human nature
and thus open the door to the most extravagant interpretations of what
essentially constitutes a human being. Here too clarity is necessary: a
"weak" vision of the person, which would leave room for every conception,
even the most bizarre, only apparently favours peace. In reality, it hinders
authentic dialogue and opens the way to authoritarian impositions,
ultimately leaving the person defenceless and, as a result, easy prey to
oppression and violence.

*Human rights and international organizations*

12. A true and stable peace presupposes respect for human rights. Yet if
these rights are grounded on a weak conception of the person, how can they
fail to be themselves weakened? Here we can see how profoundly insufficient
is *a relativistic conception of the person* when it comes to justifying and
defending his rights. The difficulty in this case is clear: rights are
proposed as absolute, yet the foundation on which they are supposed to rest
is merely relative. Can we wonder that, faced with the "inconvenient"
demands posed by one right or another, someone will come along to question
it or determine that it should be set aside? Only if they are grounded in
the objective requirements of the nature bestowed on man by the Creator, can
the rights attributed to him be affirmed without fear of contradiction. It
goes without saying, moreover, that human rights imply corresponding duties.
In this regard, Mahatma Gandhi said wisely: "The Ganges of rights flows from
the Himalaya of duties." Clarity over these basic presuppositions is needed
if human rights, nowadays constantly under attack, are to be adequately
defended. Without such clarity, the expression "human rights" will end up
being predicated of quite different subjects: in some cases, the human
person marked by permanent dignity and rights that are valid always,
everywhere and for everyone, in other cases a person with changing dignity
and constantly negotiable rights, with regard to content, time and place.

13. The protection of human rights is constantly referred to by
international bodies and, in particular, the United Nations Organization,
which set itself the fundamental task of promoting the human rights
indicated in the 1948 Universal Declaration. That Declaration is regarded as
a sort of *moral commitment assumed by all mankind*. There is a profound
truth to this, especially if the rights described in the Declaration are
held to be based not simply on the decisions of the assembly that approved
them, but on man's very nature and his inalienable dignity as a person
created by God. Consequently it is important for international agencies not
to lose sight of the natural foundation of human rights. This would enable
them to avoid the risk, unfortunately ever-present, of sliding towards a
merely positivistic interpretation of those rights. Were that to happen, the
international bodies would end up lacking the necessary authority to carry
out their role as defenders of the fundamental rights of the person and of
peoples, the chief justification for their very existence and activity.

*International humanitarian law and the internal law of States*

14. The recognition that there exist inalienable human rights connected to
our common human nature has led to the establishment of a body
of*international humanitarian law
* which States are committed to respect, even in the case of war.
Unfortunately, to say nothing of past cases, this has not been consistently
implemented in certain recent situations of war. Such, for example, was the
case in the conflict that occurred a few months ago in southern Lebanon,
where the duty "to protect and help innocent victims" and to avoid involving
the civilian population was largely ignored. The heart-rending situation in
Lebanon and the new shape of conflicts, especially since the terrorist
threat unleashed * completely new forms of violence*, demand that the
international community reaffirm international humanitarian law, and apply
it to all present-day situations of armed conflict, including those not
currently provided for by international law. Moreover, the scourge of
terrorism demands a profound reflection on the ethical limits restricting
the use of modern methods of guaranteeing internal security. Increasingly,
wars are not declared, especially when they are initiated by terrorist
groups determined to attain their ends by any means available. In the face
of the disturbing events of recent years, States cannot fail to recognize
the need to establish clearer rules to counter effectively the dramatic
decline that we are witnessing. War always represents a failure for the
international community and a grave loss for humanity. When, despite every
effort, war does break out, at least the essential principles of humanity
and the basic values of all civil coexistence must be safeguarded; norms of
conduct must be established that limit the damage as far as possible and
help to alleviate the suffering of civilians and of all the victims of
conflicts(7<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn7>
).

15. Another disturbing issue is the desire recently shown by some States to
* acquire nuclear weapons*. This has heightened even more the widespread
climate of uncertainty and fear of a possible atomic catastrophe. We are
brought back in time to the profound anxieties of the "cold war" period.
When it came to an end, there was hope that the atomic peril had been
definitively overcome and that mankind could finally breathe a lasting sigh
of relief. How timely, in this regard, is the warning of the Second Vatican
Council<http://www.vatican. va/archive/ hist_councils/ ii_vatican_ council/index. htm>that
"every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole
cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and
humanity, which merits firm and unequivocal
condemnation( 8<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn8>)."
Unfortunately, threatening clouds continue to gather on humanity's horizon.
The way to ensure a future of peace for everyone is found not only in
international accords for *the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons*, but
also in the determined commitment to seek their reduction and definitive
dismantling. May every attempt be made to arrive through negotiation at the
attainment of these objectives! The fate of the whole human family is at
stake!

*The Church as safeguard of the transcendence of the human person*

16. Finally, I wish to make an urgent appeal to the People of God: let every
Christian be committed to tireless peace-making and strenuous defence of the
dignity of the human person and his inalienable rights.

With gratitude to the Lord for having called him to belong to his Church,
which is "the sign and safeguard of the transcendental dimension of the
human person"(9<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ benedict_ xvi/messages/ peace/documents/ hf_ben-xvi_ mes_20061208_ xl-world- day-peace_ en.html#_ ftn9>)
in the world, the Christian will tirelessly implore from God the fundamental
good of peace, which is of such primary importance in the life of each
person. Moreover, he will be proud to serve the cause of peace with generous
devotion, offering help to his brothers and sisters, especially those who,
in addition to suffering poverty and need, are also deprived of this
precious good. Jesus has revealed to us that "*God is love*" (*1 Jn* 4:8)
and that the highest vocation of every person is love. In Christ we can find
the ultimate reason for becoming staunch champions of human dignity and
courageous builders of peace.

17. Let every believer, then, unfailingly contribute to the
advancement of*a true integral humanism
* in accordance with the teachings of the Encyclical Letters* Populorum
Progressio<http://www.vatican. va/holy_father/ paul_vi/encyclic als/documents/ hf_p-vi_enc_ 26031967_ populorum_ en.html>
* and * Sollicitudo Rei Socialis<http://www.vatican. va/edocs/ ENG0223/_ INDEX.HTM>
*, whose respective fortieth and twentieth anniversaries we prepare to
celebrate this year. To the Queen of Peace, the Mother of Jesus Christ "our
peace" (*Eph* 2:14), I entrust my urgent prayer for all humanity at the
beginning of the year 2007, to which we look with hearts full of hope,
notwithstanding the dangers and difficulties that surround us. May Mary show
us, in her Son, the Way of peace, and enlighten our vision, so that we can
recognize Christ's face in the face of every human person, the heart of
peace!

*From the Vatican, 8 December 2006.*

*BENEDICTUS PP. XVI*




(Dapat dari Milist)

1. Lukas datang dari Sanger kong kuliah di
   Jakarta.Tiap hr depe tamang2 pulang pigi kampus pake
   oto pribadi, akhirnya dia nyanda tahan, dia tulis
   surat dia pe papa di Sanger. Pa, napa tamang2 ke
   kampus bawa kuda,sama bawa kijang, Ronald bawa bebek,
   no kita dang :(( ? Depe papa jawab, tanang kasiang,
   nanti papa kirim akang babi :@) :D

 

2. BERAPA LITER
   Suatu waktu, Kale pigi pa Oom Petu pe warong. Pas
   sampe dimuka warong.

 

Kale: "Oom Petu, bli roko dang...?"

 

Oom Petu : (acuh sambil ba ator jualan)

 

Kale: (deng suara yang sadiki keras) "Oom Petu...bli roko
dang ?"

 

Oom Petu : (masih tetap acuh)

Kale : (bataria keras skali) "Oom petu....! Bli roko
dang...!"

 

Oom Petu : (deng nada marah) "Eh..Kale, baku
hormat sadiki deng orang tua, ngana pe kira kita pongo ? Brapa liter
minya so ngana mo bli ?"

Kale : ???

 

6. BAKU TINGGI PANGKAT PAPA
Ale : "Kita pe papa waktu taong 1975, depe pangkat so
Mayor. Skarang, so Mayjen." Utu : "Ah..kalu kita pe
Oom taong 1970 so Kolonel." Ale : "Berarti
so Jendral skarang kang ?" Utu : "Nyanda, so
meninggal."

 

7. PARTAI KE 49
Utu deng Ola ada bacirita serius soal pemilu yang
lalu.
Utu : "Eh..Ola..ngana tau nyandak, kalu sebenarnya
jumlah partai yang mo iko pemilu kalamaring bukang
cuma 48, maar ada 49. Cuma tu satu nyanda dapa kase
izin iko pemilu"

 

Ola : "Apa so tu partai itu ?"

 

Utu : "Partai Perempuan Indonesia"

Ola : "Kiapa kasiang dorang nyanda dapa kase iko pemilu?"

Utu : "Dorang nyanda dapa kase iko lantaran dorang pe
lambang partai"

Ola : "Apa so dorang pe lambang partai?"

Utu : "Tantu katu lambang parampuang noh..!"
Utu : "Untung panitia pemilu nyanda kase ijin for
dorang mo iko pemilu, kalu nyanda, samua pemilih
laki-laki pasti cuma suka mo bapilih tu partai"

 

Ola : "Bicara lagi lei ngana ta lempar deng sloop...!"

 

9. Da babantu mar salah Sangka

Pulang dari greja, om Utu pe dua mata bangka deng'
biru merah, sampe de pe istri kage skali... Kong om
Utu pe istri, tanta Mintje tanya "Utu, kiapa sampe
bagitu tu' mata ?" Om Utu : "Tadi kwa di greja
samantara manyanyi, tiba tiba ada cewek fasung maso
deng rok pendek, maar de pe rok dang', agak kurang
rapih dan kurang sadap dipandang khalayak. Karna dia
badiri pas pa kita pe muka, jadi kita da se rapih
akang de pe rok dang..., maar tu' cewek malah 'da
tinju akang kamari 'tu mata sablah kiri..."
Tanta Mintje : "Maar, kiapa 'tu mata kanan bangka
dang...?" Om Utu : "Karna kita kira dia nyanda' suka
'da kasih rapih de pe rok, kong terpaksa kita kase
bale ke posisi samula noh..., kong
dia tinju tu biji mata sablah..."

 

10. KIRIM SURAT NDA PERNAH BALAS

Utu, seorang murid SMP yang terkenal nakal, ditegur
oleh Ibu Gurunya.

 

Ibu Guru : " Utu, kiapa kalamarin
ngana nyanda maso skolah ?"

 

Utu : " Sakit, Nci!"

 

Ibu Guru : " Kiapa nyanda kirim surat ?"

 

Utu : "Percuma ! Nci kwa nyanda
pernah balas...???? ?"

 

11.

Om Buang (nama samaran) : "Eh, Tole oki....ko e mengan-ngan man
gula-gula, kuanu eng gaga, ma lewo mo u gigi nu" (Eh, anak kecil... ngana
makan trus permen, ngana kira bagus, mo rusak ngana pe gigi)

Tole : diam sambil terus mengunyah...

Om Buang : dengan nada jengkel "Mah talinga ma ko?" ("ngana ba
dengar apa yang kita bilang"),

Tole : cuek sambil terus mengunyah... .

Om Buang : tambah marah "Ka zepal no kane" ("rasa-rasa kita mo
tampeleng")

Tole : mata merah somo manangis...

Om Buang : ba bise (bisik).... "Eh...Wehampe? " ("Masih ada?)

Maksudnya Om Buang lei mau itu gula-gula... maar ada bumbu akang deng acara
marah-marah. ..

 

BREAKING NEWS

Menurut penelitian yg di lakukan oleh para Profesor ahli dari jepang selama
hampir 20 tahun akhirnya mereka mengumumkan keputusan yg sangat mengejutkan
kita semua tentang cara kita tidur selama ini. Ternyata tidur telentang
sangat tidak di anjurkan sama sekali oleh para
peneliti dari jepang.

Berikut kutipan dari Prof. Dr. Yosihiro tanpa muka :
"Kalo tidur jangan sekali kali dengan posisi TELENTANG!!. .. Karena tidur
TELENTANG itu bisa mengganggu kesehatan anda. Beberapa survei telah
dilakukan dan menghasilkan bukti yg akurat."

Orang2 yg tidur TELENTANG akan mengalami gejala2 sbb:

1.Susah bernafas
2.Tersedak
3.Pencernaan terganggu
4.Yg paling fatal, dapat menyebabkan KEMATIAN!!.. .

Oleh karena itu,
disarankan agar anda menghindari tidur TELENTANG,

Sebab jangankan tidur TELEN TANG, TELEN BAUT saja susahnya udah stengah mati
.....

Serius banget sich bacanya .....